Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois granted Effingham Community Unit School District #40’s motion to dismiss Julie Hodges’s Title VII and Illinois Human Rights Act claims. The court held that Hodges did not plausibly allege a religious conflict with the COVID-19 weekly testing requirement, distinguishing religious objections from personal or medical objections. The court granted Hodges leave to file an amended complaint by April 13, 2026.
Holdings
- Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a plausible Title VII claim for failure to accommodate religious beliefs because it does not allege a nexus between her objection to COVID-19 testing and any religious belief.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's complaint states a plausible Title VII claim for failure to accommodate religious beliefs based on COVID-19 vaccination and testing requirements.
- Whether plaintiff's objection to COVID-19 testing was based on religious beliefs sufficient to state a religious accommodation claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (17)
- Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy Partners, 682 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2012)(cited)
- Richards v. Mitcheff, 696 F.3d 635 (7th Cir. 2012)(cited)
- Burke v. 401 N. Wabash Venture, LLC, 714 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2013)(cited)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)(cited)
- Bilek v. Fed. Ins. Co., 8 F.4th 581 (7th Cir. 2021)(cited)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)(cited)
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A., 614 F.3d 400 (7th Cir. 2010)(cited)
- Begwe v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 811 F.3d 866 (7th Cir. 2016)(cited)
- Moultrie v. Penn Aluminum Int'l, LLC, 766 F.3d 747 (7th Cir. 2014)(cited)
- Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLC, 721 F.3d 444 (7th Cir. 2013)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…