Kenneth R. Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

No. 3:25-CV-1544-NJR (S.D. Ill. Jan. 26, 2026) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois · January 26, 2026 · No. 3:25-CV-1544-NJR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois dismissed without prejudice Kenneth R. Smith’s petition seeking placement in a residential re-entry center. The court held that the requested relief was not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and that, even if construed as an Administrative Procedure Act claim, Smith failed to exhaust Bureau of Prisons administrative remedies before filing suit.

Holdings

  1. A challenge seeking placement in a Residential Re-entry Center, rather than a change in the fact or duration of confinement, is a challenge to the conditions or location of custody and is not cognizable under § 2241.
  2. Smith could not obtain relief under the APA because he filed suit before completing the BOP's administrative-remedy process.
  3. The Court granted the motion to substitute Joseph Wadas as respondent.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a federal prisoner's challenge to the timing or fact of Residential Re-entry Center placement is cognizable in a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
  2. Whether Smith could proceed under the Administrative Procedure Act when he had not completed the BOP's administrative-remedy process before filing suit.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (11)

  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 490 (1973)(followed)
  • Valona v. United States, 138 F.3d 693, 694 (7th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Williams v. Lillard, No. 25-1125-DWD, 2025 WL 1880039, at *1 (S.D. Ill. June 27, 2025)(followed)
  • Graham v. Broglin, 922 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 335 (1992)(followed)
  • Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 331 (2011)(followed)
  • United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Decker v. Sproul, No. 3:24-CV-02211-JPG, 2025 WL 438832, at *2 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 10, 2025)(followed)
  • Staadt v. Bezy, 119 F. App'x 784, 785 (7th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Richmond v. Scibana, 387 F.3d 602, 606 (7th Cir. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…