Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois partially granted Shelby McBride’s second motion for attorney fees following remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The court approved the calculation method based on a proportional share of counsel’s salary and overhead, but reduced the requested hours after identifying an arithmetic error in the time log. The court awarded $11,325.37 in attorney fees and expenses, including fees incurred litigating the fee request.
Holdings
- When counsel works for a legal-aid organization that does not bill clients like a traditional law firm, fees under § 1447(c) are properly calculated using a proportional share of the attorney's salary and related benefits plus attributable overhead costs.
- A plaintiff seeking fees under § 1447(c) bears the burden of proving the amounts actually incurred, and the Court may tailor documentation requirements to the stakes involved.
- Fees incurred litigating a fee request may be awarded when the opposing party acts overly aggressively or arbitrarily in contesting the fees; on the facts presented, Defendant's extensive challenges justified an award of such fees.
Questions Presented
- What method should be used to calculate attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) when counsel works for a legal-aid organization that does not bill clients at traditional hourly rates?
- What number of compensable hours should be used to calculate Plaintiff's award, including whether fees incurred litigating the fee motions may be recovered?
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries, Inc., 236 F.3d 363, 366-68 (7th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Garbie v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 211 F.3d 407, 411 (7th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Morjal v. City of Chicago, 774 F.3d 419, 422 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…