Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois denied Taft Burtton’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that a challenge to the Bureau of Prisons’ security classification concerns the conditions of confinement rather than the fact or duration of custody and therefore cannot proceed through habeas corpus.
Holdings
- A challenge to a prisoner's security classification is a challenge to the conditions of confinement, not to the fact or duration of confinement, and therefore cannot be maintained through a § 2241 habeas petition.
- The petition was dismissed with prejudice because it plainly appeared that Burtton was not entitled to habeas relief in the district court.
- A certificate of appealability was denied because no reasonable jurist would find the court's ruling debatable or wrong.
Questions Presented
- Whether a federal prisoner may use 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge a change in custodial security classification.
- Whether Burtton's security-classification challenge implicated the fact or duration of his confinement so as to fall within habeas jurisdiction.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (10)
- In re Hall, 988 F.3d 376, 378 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 490 (1973)(followed)
- Waletzki v. Keohane, 13 F.3d 1079, 1080 (7th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Graham v. Broglin, 922 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Williams v. Wisconsin, 336 F.3d 576, 579 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Robinson v. Sherrod, 631 F.3d 839, 840-41 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Brown v. Roal, No. 12-cv-324, 2012 WL 3527079, at *1 (S.D. Ill. Aug. 14, 2012)(followed)
- Brown v. Roal-Warner, No. 11-cv-479, 2012 WL 591402, at *2 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 22, 2012)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115 (2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…