Kendell Anderson v. Lucid Group USA, Inc.

Anderson v. Lucid Group USA, Inc. · United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division · March 31, 2026 · No. 4:25-cv-00040-SEB-KMB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted Lucid Group USA, Inc.'s motion to compel arbitration in a dispute concerning alleged vehicle defects, warranty claims, and an Indiana motor vehicle protection statute claim. The court held that the parties had a valid arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, that Lucid had not waived arbitration, and that the plaintiff's prior participation in the voluntary BBB AUTO LINE process did not satisfy or replace the contractual arbitration obligation.

Holdings

  1. The written arbitration agreement was governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and covered Anderson's claims arising from the purchase and use of the Lucid vehicle.
  2. Lucid did not waive its right to compel arbitration.
  3. Anderson's participation in BBB AUTO LINE did not fulfill, replace, or invalidate the parties' contractual obligation to proceed to binding arbitration.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Lucid waived its contractual right to compel arbitration by delaying its motion and by directing Anderson to the BBB AUTO LINE process.
  2. Whether Anderson's participation in the BBB AUTO LINE process fulfilled or replaced the parties' contractual obligation to submit unresolved disputes to binding arbitration.
  3. Whether the parties' written arbitration agreement covered Anderson's claims and was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Gupta v. Morgan Stanly Smith Barney, LLC, 934 F.3d 705, 710 (7th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339 (2011)(followed)
  • Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 56 (2003)(followed)
  • Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265, 274 (1995)(followed)
  • Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 417 F.3d 682, 687 (7th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Kawasaki Heavy Indus., Ltd. v. Bombardier Recreational Prods., Inc., 660 F.3d 988 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…