Summary
The court reviews a Social Security disability benefits determination under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). It reverses the administrative law judge’s decision and remands because the ALJ failed to adequately address the plaintiff’s reported fatigue, medication-related tiredness, and need for daily naps when evaluating subjective symptoms and formulating the residual functional capacity. The court does not reach the plaintiff’s remaining arguments.
Holdings
- The ALJ erred by failing to address Plaintiff's asserted need to lie down or nap daily and by failing to explain why that symptom was not credible or how it affected the residual functional capacity.
- Remand was warranted because the ALJ failed to build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence concerning fatigue to the RFC and disability determination.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ adequately evaluated Plaintiff's subjective symptoms under SSR 16-3p, particularly his alleged fatigue and need to take daily naps.
- Whether the ALJ adequately explained the residual functional capacity finding in light of Plaintiff's testimony concerning fatigue, medication side effects, and required rest.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (22)
- Biestek v. Berryhill, 587 U.S. 97, 98 (2019)(followed)
- Stephens v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 323, 327 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Zoch v. Saul, 981 F.3d 597, 601 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Summers v. Berryhill, 864 F.3d 523, 528 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Peeters v. Saul, 975 F.3d 639, 641 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Beardsley v. Colvin, 758 F.3d 834, 837 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Warnell v. O'Malley, 97 F.4th 1050, 1053 (7th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Zellweger v. Saul, 984 F.3d 1251, 1252 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Karen A. R. v. Saul, 2019 WL 3369283, at *5 (S.D. Ind. July 26, 2019)(followed)
- Villano v. Astrue, 556 F.3d 558, 562 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…