Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed Damond Lamont McCauley, Jr.'s prisoner civil-rights complaint at the screening stage under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court held that the complaint did not adequately allege personal involvement or deliberate indifference supporting an Eighth Amendment conditions-of-confinement claim and that several additional allegations were unrelated or lacked identified responsible defendants. The court granted McCauley leave to file an amended complaint by April 17, 2026.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a claim against Sollose because it contained no allegations establishing her personal involvement or a causal connection to the alleged constitutional deprivation.
- The complaint failed to state an Eighth Amendment conditions-of-confinement claim because it did not allege sufficient facts concerning the duration and objective seriousness of the conditions or establish that Murray and Kmetz knowingly disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm.
- Claims concerning inadequate medical care, medication, grievance processes, dirty showers, and separate cell conditions could not be pursued together merely as a general list of grievances without allegations connecting the defendants and events as required by Rule 20(a)(2).
- The court granted McCauley leave to file an amended complaint because the case was at an early stage and amendment might cure the pleading deficiencies.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a conditions-of-confinement claim under the Eighth Amendment against Lt. Murray and Kmetz.
- Whether the complaint stated a claim against Sollose when it contained no allegations of her personal involvement.
- Whether the complaint improperly joined unrelated claims concerning medical care, medication, showers, grievances, and another cell placement.
- Whether McCauley should be granted leave to amend after dismissal at the early screening stage.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (18)
- Schillinger v. Kiley, 954 F.3d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Cesal v. Moats, 851 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Lisby v. Henderson, 74 F.4th 470, 472 (7th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Colbert v. City of Chicago, 851 F.3d 649, 657 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Gillis v. Litscher, 468 F.3d 488, 491 (7th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Giles v. Godinez, 914 F.3d 1040, 1051 (7th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994)(followed)
- Thomas v. Blackard, 2 F.4th 716, 720 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…