Devon Odom v. Hinds County, Mississippi, et al.

Odom · United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Northern Division · March 30, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-42-KHJ-MTP

Summary

The court partially grants and partially denies Plaintiff Devon Odom’s motion for attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in obtaining an order compelling discovery from Hinds County. Applying the lodestar method and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(C), the court awards $11,808.75 after reducing the requested fees by 6% to reflect Plaintiff’s partial success.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff's requested hourly rates of $375 for attorney time and $100 for paralegal time were reasonable under the circumstances.
  2. The claimed 34.6 hours, consisting of 33.1 attorney hours and 1.5 paralegal hours, were reasonably expended.
  3. A fee reduction was appropriate because Plaintiff achieved only partial success, but Hinds County's requested reduction of at least 25% was not warranted; a 6% reduction adequately reflected Plaintiff's lack of success.
  4. Plaintiff was entitled to $11,808.75 in reasonable attorney's fees, representing the requested $12,562.50 reduced by 6%.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's requested attorney and paralegal hourly rates were reasonable.
  2. Whether the hours claimed in connection with the motion to compel and related fee proceedings were reasonably expended.
  3. Whether the fee award should be apportioned or reduced because Plaintiff partially failed to obtain the requested discovery.
  4. What amount of attorney's fees and expenses should be awarded under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(C).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (16)

  • Combs v. City of Huntington, 829 F.3d 388, 392 (5th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Auto Parts Mfg. Miss. Inc. v. King Constr. of Houston, LLC, 258 F. Supp. 3d 740, 754 (N.D. Miss. 2017)(followed)
  • Tollett v. City of Kemah, 285 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974)(followed)
  • Gurule v. Land Guardian, Inc., 912 F.3d 252, 257 n.3 (5th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Walker v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urb. Dev., 99 F.3d 761, 770 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Pickett v. Miss. Bd. of Animal Health, 2021 WL 4979009, at *4 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 26, 2021)(followed)
  • United States ex rel. Jehl v. GGNSC Southaven, LLC, 2024 WL 1145962, at *2 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 14, 2024)(followed)
  • Haddonfield Foods, Inc. v. S. Hens, Inc., 2022 WL 20438231, at *2 (S.D. Miss. Nov. 3, 2022)(followed)
  • S. Refuge, LLC v. Bondurant, 2023 WL 2998475, at *3 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 18, 2023)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…