Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, finding that the Administrative Law Judge made factual inaccuracies concerning the plaintiff’s lumbar-spine range of motion. The court reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings.
Holdings
- When no party timely objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court applies the clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion, and contrary to law standard of review rather than de novo review.
- The Commissioner's final decision must be reversed and the case remanded for further administrative proceedings because the ALJ relied on factual inaccuracies concerning White's lumbar-spine range of motion, and the correct information could have affected the decision.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be reviewed under the clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion, and contrary to law standard when no party timely objects.
- Whether the Commissioner's final decision should be reversed and remanded because the ALJ relied on factual inaccuracies concerning White's lumbar-spine range of motion.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (1)
- 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…