Summary
The magistrate judge recommends dismissing as moot Meet Prajapati’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his immigration detention and denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. The recommendation concludes that Petitioner’s removal to India and release from ICE custody eliminated the live controversy. The respondent’s motion to dismiss for mootness is recommended for granting.
Holdings
- The petition became moot because Petitioner was removed from the United States and released from ICE custody, so the requested relief of release from detention could no longer provide him a live, redressable remedy.
- The motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied as moot because Petitioner had been removed and was no longer in ICE custody.
Questions Presented
- Whether Prajapati's § 2241 petition seeking release from immigration detention became moot after he was removed from the United States and released from ICE custody.
- Whether the motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied as moot after Prajapati's removal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Lewis v. Cont'l Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990)(followed)
- Bacilio-Sabastian v. Barr, 980 F.3d 480, 482 (5th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. 103, 106 (2020)(followed)
- Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…