Summary
This is a Southern District of New York order in a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court stayed the petitioner’s removal and restricted his transfer pending further order, directed counsel to appear for a conference, and requested briefing or argument concerning the petitioner’s location at filing and the potential application of recent immigration decisions.
Holdings
- Pending a ruling on the habeas petition, petitioner shall not be removed from the United States absent further order of the court.
- Pending further order, respondents shall not transfer petitioner except to a facility within the Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, or District of New Jersey.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should temporarily stay petitioner's removal to preserve its jurisdiction over the § 2241 petition.
- Whether the court should restrict respondents from transferring petitioner outside specified nearby districts pending further order.
- Whether petitioner's location at the time of filing affected the court's jurisdiction and whether the case was distinguishable from recent immigration habeas decisions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Khalil v. Joyce, No. 25-CV-01935 (JMF), 2025 WL 750599, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025)(followed)
- Du v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., No. 25-CV-644 (OAW), 2025 WL 1317944, at *1 (D. Conn. Apr. 24, 2025)(followed)
- Perez y Perez v. Noem, No. 25-CV-4828 (DEH), 2025 WL 1908284, at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. June 13, 2025)(followed)
- Arostegui-Maldonado v. Baltazar, No. 25-CV-2205-WJM-STV, 2025 WL 2280357, at *14-16 (D. Colo. Aug. 8, 2025)(followed)
- Oliveros v. Kaiser, No. 25-CV-07117-BLF, 2025 WL 2677125, at *8-9, *11 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 18, 2025)(followed)
- Guzman Cardenas v. Almodovar, No. 25-CV-9169 (JMF), 2025 WL 3215573 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2025)(considered)
- Khabazha v. U.S. Imm. & Customs Enforcement, No. 25-CV-5279 (JMF), 2025 WL 3281514, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 2025)(considered)
- Öztürk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382, 391-92 (2d Cir. 2025)(considered)
- Khalil v. Joyce, 771 F. Supp. 3d 268 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…