Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York grants the pro se petitioner leave to file an amended habeas petition under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). The court directs the petitioner to file the amended petition and requires the respondent to submit a supplemental response within two weeks.
Holdings
- A habeas petitioner may amend the petition only with the court's permission when the amendment is sought after the Government's response, because Rule 15(a)(1)(B) does not apply where responsive pleadings are not required in habeas proceedings.
- Leave to amend should be granted because the record did not show undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, or futility, and justice required allowing the pro se petitioner to amend.
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner should be granted leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to amend his habeas petition after the Government filed its response.
- Whether the incomplete docket filing and timing of the amendment request warranted denial of leave to amend.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Zarvela v. Artuz, 254 F.3d 374, 382 (2d Cir. 2001), as amended (June 26, 2001), as amended (Aug. 17, 2001)(followed)
- Argraves v. United States, No. 3:11-CV-1421, 2013 WL 1856527, at *2 (D. Conn. May 2, 2013)(followed)
- Abellard v. King, No. 24-CV-03719, 2025 WL 746022, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2025)(followed)
- Sacerdote v. New York University, 9 F.4th 95, 115 (2d Cir. 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…