Summary
The court grants defense counsel Daniel Singer’s renewed application to withdraw as counsel of record based on substantial unpaid fees and an irreconcilable attorney-client relationship. The court denies without prejudice the defendants’ request for an interim stay and requires defendant Robert Willoughby to attend a scheduled status conference, warning that nonattendance may result in a recommendation for default judgment. The court directs service of the order and termination of Singer as counsel on the docket.
Holdings
- Counsel demonstrated good cause and satisfactory reasons for withdrawal where Defendants did not dispute nonpayment, the failure to pay made the attorney-client relationship irreconcilable, and trial was not imminent.
- Local Civil Rule 1.4 does not require an attorney to accept a payment plan for unpaid fees.
- The interim stay was denied without prejudice because Defendants had not yet shown sufficient good-faith efforts to retain new counsel.
Questions Presented
- Whether defense counsel demonstrated satisfactory reasons and good cause to withdraw as attorney of record based on Defendants' nonpayment of fees and the resulting breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.
- Whether Defendants were entitled to an interim stay of proceedings to obtain substitute counsel.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Farmer v. Hyde Your Eyes Optical, Inc., 60 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)(followed)
- Allen v. Krucial Staffing, LLC, No. 20-CV-2859 (JGK), 2022 WL 2106447, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2022)(followed)
- City of Almaty, Kazakhstan v. Sater, No. 19-CV-2645 (JGK), 2024 WL 1484051, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2024)(followed)
- Whiting v. Lacara, 187 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 1999)(distinguished)
- Spadola v. New York City Transit Auth., No. 00-CV-3262 (VM), 2002 WL 59423, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2002)(followed)
- Wilson v. Pasquale's DaMarino's, Inc., No. 10-CV-2709 (PGG), 2018 WL 4761574, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2018)(followed)
- In re Meyers, 120 B.R. 751 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990)(followed)
- Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 657 B.R. 382 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2024)(followed)
- United States v. Stein, 488 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…