Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Fleetzero Inc.'s motion to transfer Atlantic Oceanic LLC's petition to vacate an arbitration damages award. Applying the first-filed rule, the court held that the Western District of Louisiana was a proper venue and that Atlantic had not shown that convenience factors favored retaining the case in New York. The court directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the Western District of Louisiana.
Holdings
- Venue was proper in the Western District of Louisiana because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the dispute occurred there and the vessel that was the subject of the arbitration primarily operated there during the charter.
- Transfer to the Western District of Louisiana was warranted under the first-filed rule because Fleetzero filed the first action concerning the same arbitration proceeding and Atlantic did not establish a sufficient exception based on convenience or special circumstances.
- The balance of convenience did not favor retaining the case in the Southern District of New York.
Questions Presented
- Whether venue was proper in the Western District of Louisiana for the petition concerning the maritime arbitration award.
- Whether the first-filed rule warranted transferring Atlantic's later-filed New York action to the Western District of Louisiana.
- Whether the balance of convenience and interests of justice favored retaining the action in the Southern District of New York rather than transferring it to Louisiana.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- N.Y. Marine & Gen. Ins. Co. v. Lafarge N. Am., Inc., 599 F.3d 102, 112-14 (2d Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. v. Bernstein Liebhard LLP, No. 14-CV-9839 (JMF), 2015 WL 5751252, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2015)(followed)
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 106 (2d Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Webb v. Citigroup Glob. Markets, Inc., No. 19-CV-0535 (PAE), 2019 WL 4081893, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2019)(followed)
- Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co., 529 U.S. 193, 195 (2000)(followed)
- Emps. Ins. of Wausau v. Fox Ent. Grp., Inc., 522 F.3d 271, 275 (2d Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v. Schneider, 435 F. Supp. 742, 751 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…