Summary
This document contains a letter by Vinci Brands, LLC and Charles Tebele seeking to keep an exhibit containing private banking information under seal in litigation against Coach Services, Inc. The letter invokes the Second Circuit’s framework governing public access to judicial documents and argues that the privacy interests in personal financial information justify sealing. A court order grants the sealing request and directs the Clerk to maintain or remove restrictions on specified docket entries.
Holdings
- The court granted the motion to seal Exhibit E because it contained private banking information and other financially sensitive information whose privacy interests overcame the presumption of public access.
- The parties' motion to seal was granted; the Clerk was directed to maintain sealing at ECF Nos. 953-1 and 969-1, remove restrictions from specified related docket entries, and close the motions at ECF Nos. 968 and 974.
Questions Presented
- Whether Exhibit E containing private banking and financially sensitive information should remain under seal.
- Whether the court should maintain the sealing of specified docket entries and remove restrictions from other docket entries.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co., 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006)(followed)
- United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir. 1995)(followed)
- City of Almaty, Kazakhstan v. Ablyazov, No. 15 Civ. 5345, 2021 WL 1177737, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…