Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) following a successful Social Security disability appeal. The court awarded $18,739.04, representing 25% of the claimant’s past-due benefits, and ordered counsel to remit any EAJA fees previously received to Plaintiff to prevent double recovery.
Holdings
- A fee of $18,739.04 was permissible because it equaled 25 percent of Plaintiff's total past-due SSD and SSI benefits of $74,956.15.
- The requested $18,739.04 contingency fee was reasonable and did not constitute a windfall.
- Counsel must remit to Plaintiff any amount previously received under the EAJA to prevent double recovery of fees.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's requested fee of $18,739.04 was permissible under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1).
- Whether the requested contingency fee was reasonable and did not constitute a windfall.
- Whether counsel must remit fees previously received under the EAJA to Plaintiff to prevent double recovery.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Jankovich v. Brown, 886 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 802 (2002)(followed)
- Rodriquez v. Brown, 865 F.2d 739, 746 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Hayes v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 923 F.2d 418, 422 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Jearame B. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:21-cv-228, 2023 WL 1861429, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 9, 2023)(followed)
- Amanda Mary B. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:20-CV-1036, 2024 WL 3337772, at *2-*3 (S.D. Ohio July 9, 2024)(followed)
- Amanda B. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:20-CV-1036, 2024 WL 3696373 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2024)(followed)
- Twyla D. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, No. 3:19-CV-368, 2025 WL 715510, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 6, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…