Ease Logistics Services, LLC v. Zeatoon Inc d/b/a Cross Forest, et al.

Ease Logistics · United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division · December 22, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-482

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio denied without prejudice Plaintiff Ease Logistics Services, LLC’s motion to strike Defendants’ jury demand. The court held that the contractual jury-waiver provision signed by Zeatoon Inc. could not, at this early stage, be enforced against nonsignatory defendants based solely on allegations that they were alter egos or agents of Zeatoon Inc. The court left open the possibility of a renewed motion after discovery produced supporting evidence.

Holdings

  1. A court may not enforce a contractual jury-trial waiver against non-signatory defendants based merely on allegations that they are agents or alter egos of the signatory; supporting evidence is required before concluding that the non-signatories knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally waived their constitutional jury-trial right.
  2. A motion to strike a jury demand may be renewed after discovery develops evidence relevant to whether a contractual jury waiver binds the non-signatory defendants.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could enforce the Broker-Carrier Agreement's jury-trial waiver against Zeatoon LLC and Fathi A. Alawad, who did not sign the agreement, based solely on allegations that they were agents or alter egos of Zeatoon Inc.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's motion to strike the jury demand should be denied without prejudice so that the issue could be revisited after discovery.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Loc. 783, Allied Indus. Workers of Am., AFLCIO v. Gen. Elec. Co., 471 F.2d 751, 755 (6th Cir. 1973)(followed)
  • Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474, 486 (1935)(followed)
  • Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389, 393 (1937)(followed)
  • K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Tr. Co., 757 F.2d 752, 755–56 (6th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Hulsey v. West, 966 F.2d 579, 581 (10th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279, 294 (2002)(followed)
  • Arthur Anderson LLP v. Carlisle, 556 U.S. 624, 631 (2009)(followed)
  • Cap City Dental Lab, LLC v. Ladd, No. 2:15-CV-2407, 2016 WL 4573993, at *12 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 1, 2016)(analogized)
  • Trent P. Fisher Enters., LLC v. SAS Automation, LLC, No. 3:20-cv-216, 2023 WL 8358982, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2023)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…