Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio grants Jessie Adams leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Following screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the magistrate judge recommends dismissal because the complaint's allegations concerning ex parte communications, conspiracy, and due process violations lack sufficient factual content to state a plausible claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a).
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a claim because its conclusory allegations of ex parte communications, conspiracy, and due process violations did not provide sufficient factual content or context to permit a reasonable inference of liability.
- Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a plausible claim for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
- Whether the plaintiff should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992)(followed)
- Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989)(followed)
- Hill v. Lappin, 630 F.3d 468, 470-71 (6th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- 16630 Southfield Ltd., P'Ship v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B., 727 F.3d 502, 503-04 (6th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Garrett v. Belmont Cty. Sheriff's Dep't, 374 F. App'x 612, 614 (6th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)(followed)
- Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App'x 975, 976-77 (6th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…