Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio adopted a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and held Robert Queen II and BC Inventory, LLC in contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena and appear at a show-cause hearing. The court imposed a $100-per-day fine on each party beginning May 28, 2024, until compliance, and ordered them to pay the plaintiff’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs related to the contempt proceedings.
Holdings
- The district court adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation because no objections were filed and the recommendation was not shown to contain clear error.
- A person served with a subpoena may be held in contempt under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(g) when the person fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it; Robert Queen II and BC Inventory, LLC met that standard.
- A coercive fine of $100 per day, beginning May 28, 2024 and continuing until compliance with Rule 45, together with reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the show-cause motion and hearing, was appropriate.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation when no objections were filed.
- Whether Robert Queen II and BC Inventory, LLC could be held in contempt under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(g) for failing without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena and related court orders.
- Whether a coercive fine of $100 per day and an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs were appropriate sanctions for the subpoena noncompliance.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 144-45, 151 (1985)(followed)
- Howard v. Sec'y of HHS, 932 F.2d 505, 508-09 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 950 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Neuman v. Rivers, 125 F.3d 315, 322 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…