Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio grants Hallan Invest, SA’s motion to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b) for the limited purpose of participating in post-judgment proceedings involving JobsOhio’s garnishment efforts against EmKey Energy, LLC and EmKey Gathering, LLC. The court denies Hallan’s request for intervention as of right under Rule 24(a)(2), finding that Hallan had not shown impairment of its interests absent intervention, and denies the defendants’ related motion concerning a garnishment hearing as moot.
Holdings
- Hallan satisfied the timeliness, substantial legal interest, and inadequate-representation requirements, but failed to show that its interest might be impaired absent intervention; therefore, intervention as of right was denied.
- Hallan was permitted to intervene for the limited purpose of participating in JobsOhio's post-judgment proceedings against EmKey Energy and EmKey Gathering.
Questions Presented
- Whether Hallan Invest, SA was entitled to intervene as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2).
- Whether Hallan should be permitted to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b) in post-judgment garnishment proceedings.
- Whether the defendants' motion requesting a garnishment hearing, a continuance, and remote witness attendance remained live after Hallan was permitted to intervene and the scheduled hearing was vacated.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- JobsOhio v. EmKey Energy, LLC, 2025 WL 2780920, at *5 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 30, 2025)(followed)
- Grainger v. Ottawa County, 90 F.4th 507, 513-14, 516 (6th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Coal. to Def. Affirmative Action v. Granholm, 501 F.3d 775, 779 (6th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Bell v. Kasich, 2017 WL 3172778, at *5 (S.D. Ohio July 25, 2017)(followed)
- Bay Mills Indian Cmty. v. Snyder, 720 F. App'x 754, 759 (6th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Estate of Lewis v. City of Columbus, 2025 WL 3120050, at *4, *9 (6th Cir. Nov. 7, 2025)(followed)
- Jansen v. City of Cincinnati, 904 F.2d 336, 340 (6th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Alsaada v. City of Columbus, 2021 WL 1720999, at *2, *4 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 2021)(followed)
- Huntington Nat'l Bank v. Schneider, 2023-Ohio-4813, ¶¶ 16-20 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist.)(questioned)
- Huntington Nat'l Bank v. Schneider, 2025-Ohio-2920, ¶¶ 12, 19 (Ohio)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.