Norris v. Watson

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio adopted the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and dismissed Adam T. Norris’s case against Tom Watson with prejudice. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Norris leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Holdings

1. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety after reviewing it and noting that no timely objections had been filed.
2. The case was dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
3. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation when no timely objections were filed.
2. Whether the case should be dismissed with prejudice as recommended.
3. Whether an appeal would be taken in good faith and whether Plaintiff should be permitted to appeal in forma pauperis.

Disposition

dismissed