Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recommends denying Yohnus Adam Michael Cameron’s motion to proceed to judgment in his habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The recommendation concludes that the respondent timely filed the answer and state-court record, and it provides notice of the procedure and deadline for filing objections.
Holdings
- Respondent's Return of Writ was timely filed, so Cameron was not entitled to judgment based on an untimely response.
Questions Presented
- Whether Respondent timely complied with the court's June 12, 2025 order requiring an answer and relevant portions of the state-court record within 60 days.
- Whether Cameron was entitled to judgment against Respondent based on the alleged failure to timely answer the § 2254 petition.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…