Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted pro se Plaintiff Brian McComb leave to file a first amended complaint and instructed the Clerk to docket it. The Court denied Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings without prejudice because it was premature, and terminated as moot Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time and leave to file excess pages.
Holdings
- Leave to file the first amended complaint should be granted because amendments are freely granted when justice so requires, and the court found good cause and interests of justice and efficiency supporting amendment.
- Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings was premature and was denied without prejudice because the court granted leave to amend the complaint.
- Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to respond and motion for leave to file excess pages were terminated as moot after the court granted leave to amend and denied the motion for judgment on the pleadings without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff should be granted leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to file a first amended complaint.
- Whether defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings should be decided before the amended complaint was docketed.
- Whether plaintiff's motions for an extension of time and leave to file excess pages remained necessary after leave to amend was granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)(followed)
- Parchman v. SLM Corp., 896 F.3d 728, 736-37 (6th Cir. 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…