Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas adopts a magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation after no party filed an objection. The court dismisses the plaintiff’s claims without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and denies as moot the motion for a preliminary injunction.
Holdings
- When no timely objection is filed, the district court need only determine whether the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
- The court adopted the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety, dismissed the plaintiff's claims without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and denied the motion for a preliminary injunction as moot.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when no timely objection is filed to a magistrate judge's Memorandum and Recommendation?
- Whether the district court should adopt the Memorandum and Recommendation, dismiss the plaintiff's claims without prejudice under Rule 41(b), and deny the preliminary-injunction motion as moot.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam)(followed)
- Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…