Summary
The court grants the Texas Department of Public Safety's motion to quash a subpoena seeking the deposition of a Texas Ranger concerning conversations witnessed during an arrest. Applying Fifth Circuit precedent, the court holds that sovereign immunity protects a state agency and its official from compelled discovery, including third-party subpoenas, when the official was acting in an official capacity. The document's narrative refers to Freddie Douglas, although the caption identifies the plaintiff as John Marks.
Holdings
- State sovereign immunity prevents a federal court from compelling a state official acting in his official capacity to appear for a third-party deposition.
- The fact that the state agency and official were third parties to the litigation does not remove sovereign-immunity protection when the official acted in his official capacity.
Questions Presented
- Whether state sovereign immunity bars a federal court from compelling a state employee, acting in an official capacity, to comply with a third-party deposition subpoena.
- Whether Fifth Circuit precedent governing subpoenas directed to state entities and officials applies to the deposition of a Texas Ranger who witnessed relevant events while acting as a state official.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Russell v. Jones, 49 F.4th 507, 514–15, 518–19 (5th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Thompson v. Richter, No. 24-10837, 2025 WL 1233519, at *2 (5th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025)(followed)
- Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 715 (1999)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 (1985)(followed)
- Drs. Hosp. of Laredo v. Cigarroa, No. SA-21-CV-01068, 2023 WL 11987993, at *1 (W.D. Tex. May 19, 2023)(distinguished)
- Steadman v. Tex. Rangers, 179 F.3d 360, 363 (5th Cir. 1999)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…