Summary
This memorandum and recommendation addresses whether a pro se incarcerated plaintiff may prosecute claims purportedly assigned to him by a limited liability company. The court concludes that the company is the real party in interest and may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, even if it validly assigned its claims. The magistrate judge recommends conditional dismissal without prejudice unless the plaintiff appears through counsel within 30 days after adoption, and allows 14 days for objections.
Holdings
- An individual may not prosecute claims belonging to a limited liability company in federal court without licensed counsel, even if the LLC validly assigns the claims to that individual. The assignment does not authorize the individual to appear on the LLC's behalf.
- A district court may dismiss a claim on its own motion when the procedure is fair, including notice of the court's intention and an opportunity to respond. The proposed conditional dismissal procedure satisfied those requirements because Mitchell could object and, if the recommendation were adopted, had 30 days to appear through counsel.
Questions Presented
- Whether a sole member of a limited liability company may prosecute the company's claims in federal court without counsel.
- Whether an assignment of an LLC's claims to a pro se individual permits that individual to prosecute the claims without counsel.
- Whether the court could recommend sua sponte dismissal, subject to notice and an opportunity to object and obtain counsel.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Alt. Materials, LLC v. TCH Constr. Grp., Inc., 339 F.R.D. 322, 324 (N.D. Fla. 2021)(followed)
- Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993)(followed)
- Stark v. Kohrs, No. 1:19-cv-041, 2020 WL 734480, at *3 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2020)(followed)
- Heiskell v. Mozie, 82 F.2d 861, 863 (D.C. Cir. 1936)(followed)
- M2 Tech., Inc. v. M2 Software, Inc., 589 F. App'x 671, 675 n.2 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1386 (11th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Jones v. Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 722 F.2d 20, 23 (2d Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Davoodi v. Austin Indep. Sch. Dist., 755 F.3d 307, 310 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…