Summary
The memorandum and recommendation addresses whether an incarcerated pro se plaintiff may prosecute claims belonging to a limited liability company without licensed counsel. It recommends conditional dismissal without prejudice unless the plaintiff appears through counsel within 30 days after adoption, and advises that objections must be filed within 14 days of service.
Holdings
- A pro se individual may not prosecute claims belonging to a limited liability company because an artificial business entity must appear in federal court through licensed counsel.
- A court may recommend sua sponte dismissal when the plaintiff receives notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to respond; the proposed 30-day opportunity to obtain counsel and the objection period satisfied that fairness requirement.
Questions Presented
- Whether a pro se individual who is the sole member of a limited liability company may prosecute claims belonging to that company in federal court.
- Whether the court may sua sponte recommend conditional dismissal without prejudice while giving the plaintiff an opportunity to obtain licensed counsel.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201–02 (1993)(followed)
- Alt. Materials, LLC v. TCH Constr. Grp., Inc., 339 F.R.D. 322, 324 (N.D. Fla. 2021)(followed)
- Davoodi v. Austin Indep. Sch. Dist., 755 F.3d 307, 310 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…