Summary
The court grants in part Ericka Lass De La Mont Diaz’s habeas petition and denies the respondents’ motion for summary judgment. It holds that her re-detention after release on recognizance, without a pre-deprivation hearing or proof of changed individual circumstances, violated her Fifth Amendment right to procedural due process. The court orders her release within 48 hours and restricts any future re-detention or additional release conditions absent a hearing before an immigration judge.
Holdings
- The arbitrary revocation of Petitioner's prior release on recognizance and her re-detention without a pre-deprivation hearing or proof of changed individual circumstances violated her Fifth Amendment right to procedural due process.
- The missed electronic CART check-in could not constitutionally justify Petitioner's re-detention on the undisputed facts because she attended the relevant in-person ICE check-in and the Government did not contend that the missed electronic check-in was the basis for detention.
- The court ordered Respondents to release Petitioner within 48 hours under the terms of her prior release order and prohibited re-detention or additional release conditions during the removal proceedings absent a hearing before an immigration judge at which the Government proves by clear and convincing evidence that she is a flight risk or danger to the community, or that new conditions are necessary.
Questions Presented
- Whether ICE violated Petitioner's Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights by arbitrarily revoking her prior release on recognizance and re-detaining her without a pre-deprivation hearing or proof of changed individual circumstances.
- Whether the court needed to decide whether Petitioner's continued mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) violated substantive due process.
- What relief was appropriate for the procedural due process violation.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Betancourth v. Tate, et al., 2026 WL 638482 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2026)(followed)
- Perea-Berrio v. Tate, et al., 2026 WL 709481 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2026)(followed)
- Alvarez Rico v. Noem, et al., 2026 WL 522322 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2026)(followed)
- Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi, 166 F.4th 494 (5th Cir. 2026)(applied)
- Rodriguez v. Frink, 2026 WL 709487 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2026)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(quoted)
- Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510, 529 (2003)(discussed)
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 4 (2003)(rejected_argument_based_on)
- Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. 103 (2020)(rejected_argument_based_on)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…