Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopted a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendation and dismissed Michael Jamal Tucker’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as moot. The dismissal was based on Tucker’s release from custody, and no objections were filed to the proposed findings and recommendation.
Holdings
- The district court was not required to conduct de novo review of the magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions because Petitioner filed no timely objections.
- The petition was moot because Petitioner had been released from custody, and the action was dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2241 habeas petition was moot after Petitioner was released from custody.
- Whether the district court was required to conduct de novo review of the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation when no objections were filed.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. De Leon-Ramirez, 925 F.3d 177, 181 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…