Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopted a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations in a Social Security appeal. The court denied the plaintiff’s request for remand, granted the Commissioner’s request to affirm the agency decision, affirmed the Commissioner’s final decision, and dismissed the action.
Holdings
- Because neither party timely objected to the PF&R, the district court was not required to conduct de novo or any other review of the magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions and could adopt the PF&R.
- The court denied Plaintiff's request for remand, granted Defendant's request to affirm, and affirmed the Commissioner's final decision.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations when neither party timely objected.
- Whether Plaintiff's request for remand should be denied and the Commissioner's final decision affirmed.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…