Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopted a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation after the parties filed no objections. The court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, denied the petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, dismissed the action with prejudice, denied a certificate of appealability, and directed removal of the case from the docket.
Holdings
- The parties' failure to file timely objections waived their right to de novo review, permitting the district court to adopt the Findings and Recommendation.
- The court adopted the Findings and Recommendation, granted the respondent's motion to dismiss, denied the § 2241 habeas petition, and dismissed the action with prejudice.
- A certificate of appealability was denied because the petitioner did not satisfy the substantial-showing standard.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation when the parties filed no objections.
- Whether the respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 denied.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…