Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopted the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendation in a Social Security disability-benefits action. The court denied the plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision, granted the Commissioner’s request to affirm, affirmed the final decision, and dismissed the action.
Holdings
- A district court is not required to conduct de novo or any other review of the factual or legal conclusions in portions of a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation to which no timely objection is made.
- The plaintiff's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision was denied, the Commissioner's request to affirm was granted, the Commissioner's final decision was affirmed, and the action was dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court was required to conduct de novo or other review of the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation when neither party timely objected.
- Whether the court should adopt the magistrate judge's recommendation, affirm the Commissioner's final decision, and dismiss the action.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…