Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopts a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendation in Juvonta Lafond’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. Because Lafond was released from custody and no objections were filed, the court dismisses the petition as moot and removes the action from the docket.
Holdings
- When no timely objections are filed to a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation, the district court need not conduct de novo review of the unobjected-to factual or legal conclusions, and the party waives the right to appellate review of those conclusions.
- A § 2241 habeas petition seeking relief from custody is moot when the petitioner has been released from custody and no live controversy remains.
- A district court need not conduct de novo review when objections to a magistrate judge's PF&R are general and conclusory and fail to direct the court to a specific error.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should review the magistrate judge's PF&R de novo when no objections were filed.
- Whether Lafond's § 2241 habeas petition should be dismissed as moot following his release from custody.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. De Leon-Ramirez, 925 F.3d 177, 181 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…