Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia adopted a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation in Shawn Lanier Lowman, Jr.'s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas action. The court denied the habeas petition and a related motion concerning law-library access, and dismissed the matter after no objections were filed.
Holdings
- A district court need not conduct de novo review of the factual or legal conclusions in portions of a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation to which no timely objection is made; failure to object waives de novo review and the right to appeal those findings.
- The court adopted the PF&R, denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under § 2241, denied the motion directing the respondent to issue a memorandum, and dismissed the matter.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court was required to conduct de novo review of the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation when no objections were filed.
- Whether the court should adopt the PF&R, deny the § 2241 petition and related motion, and dismiss the action.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. De Leon-Ramirez, 925 F.3d 177, 181 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…