Dusty Rhoades v. Sheriff John Montgomery, Baxter County, Arkansas; and Lieutenant T. Maze, Jail Coordinator, Baxter County Detention Center

Rhoades v. Montgomery · United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Harrison Division · April 15, 2026 · No. 3:24-cv-03040-CDC

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas dismissed Dusty Rhoades’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Baxter County officials with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court found that Rhoades intentionally failed to comply with an order compelling discovery and failed to prosecute the case. The court also denied his motions to appoint counsel and for an extension of time.

Holdings

  1. A district court may dismiss an action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the plaintiff fails to comply with a court order or fails to prosecute, and Plaintiff's repeated failure to respond to discovery and comply with the court's discovery order warranted dismissal.
  2. The complaint should be dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff intentionally failed to comply with a court order, the case was at a relatively late stage, and Defendants had expended significant resources.
  3. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel was denied because he had demonstrated an ability to prosecute his claims and no circumstances had changed since the court denied his two earlier requests.
  4. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time was denied because it provided no explanation for the requested extension and the allotted response period was sufficient.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to comply with a discovery order and failure to prosecute.
  2. Whether the dismissal should be with prejudice.
  3. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to appointment of counsel.
  4. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Line v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31(followed)
  • Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04(followed)
  • Pardee v. Stock, 712 F.2d 1290, 1292(followed)
  • Rodgers v. Curators of University of Missouri, 135 F.3d 1216, 1219(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…