Melvin Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and The United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Jackson v. Collins · United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Hot Springs Division · February 25, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-06102-SOH-MEF

Summary

A United States magistrate judge recommends granting the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a complaint challenging the Department of Veterans Affairs’ treatment of the plaintiff’s military discharge classification and benefits-related claims. The report concludes that the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act deprives the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction because resolving the claims would require review of VA decisions affecting veterans’ benefits.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge concluded that the Veterans' Judicial Review Act strips the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction over Jackson's claims because resolving them would require the court to determine whether VA officials properly handled matters affecting his benefits and services.
  2. The report recited the Rule 12(b)(6) plausibility standard and recommended dismissal of the complaint; the recommended disposition rested principally on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Veterans' Judicial Review Act deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction because adjudicating Jackson's claims would require review of VA decisions or procedures affecting veterans' benefits.
  2. Whether Jackson's complaint satisfied the plausibility and pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and survived dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (22)

  • Herden v. United States, 726 F.3d 1042, 1046 (8th Cir. 2013) (en banc)(followed)
  • Green Acres Enters., Inc. v. United States, 418 F.3d 852, 856 (8th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Osborn v. United States, 918 F.2d 724, 729-30 (8th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Crawford v. United States, 796 F.2d 924, 928 (7th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Buckler v. United States, 919 F.3d 1038, 1044 (8th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vein Centers for Excellence, Inc., 912 F.3d 1076, 1081 (8th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Davis v. Anthony, Inc., 886 F.3d 674, 679 (8th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-79 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 562, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Whitney v. Guys, Inc., 700 F.3d 1118, 1128 (8th Cir. 2012)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 22.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…