Summary
A United States magistrate judge recommends granting the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a complaint challenging the Department of Veterans Affairs’ treatment of the plaintiff’s military discharge classification and benefits-related claims. The report concludes that the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act deprives the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction because resolving the claims would require review of VA decisions affecting veterans’ benefits.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge concluded that the Veterans' Judicial Review Act strips the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction over Jackson's claims because resolving them would require the court to determine whether VA officials properly handled matters affecting his benefits and services.
- The report recited the Rule 12(b)(6) plausibility standard and recommended dismissal of the complaint; the recommended disposition rested principally on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Veterans' Judicial Review Act deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction because adjudicating Jackson's claims would require review of VA decisions or procedures affecting veterans' benefits.
- Whether Jackson's complaint satisfied the plausibility and pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and survived dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (22)
- Herden v. United States, 726 F.3d 1042, 1046 (8th Cir. 2013) (en banc)(followed)
- Green Acres Enters., Inc. v. United States, 418 F.3d 852, 856 (8th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Osborn v. United States, 918 F.2d 724, 729-30 (8th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Crawford v. United States, 796 F.2d 924, 928 (7th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Buckler v. United States, 919 F.3d 1038, 1044 (8th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vein Centers for Excellence, Inc., 912 F.3d 1076, 1081 (8th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Davis v. Anthony, Inc., 886 F.3d 674, 679 (8th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-79 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 562, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Whitney v. Guys, Inc., 700 F.3d 1118, 1128 (8th Cir. 2012)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…