Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky granted Ninoska Reyes Lopez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging her immigration detention. The court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226, rather than § 1225(b)(2), governed her detention and ordered her immediate release, subject to a bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge before any re-detention.
Holdings
- Section 1226, rather than § 1225(b)(2), governed Lopez's detention because she was not seeking admission and was already present in the United States and placed in removal proceedings.
- Lopez's continued detention without an individualized merits bond hearing violated the Due Process Clause and the INA.
- The appropriate remedy was Lopez's immediate release from the unlawful detention and a merits bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge before any re-detention.
Questions Presented
- Whether Lopez's detention during removal proceedings was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or 8 U.S.C. § 1226.
- Whether Lopez's continued detention without an individualized merits bond hearing violated the Due Process Clause and the Immigration and Nationality Act.
- Whether release and a bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge were appropriate habeas remedies.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (15)
- Edahi v. Lewis, 2025 WL 3466682 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)
- Vicen v. Lewis, 2026 WL 541171 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 26, 2026)(followed)
- A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94 (2025)(followed)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)(followed)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 529 (2004)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
- Munoz Materano, 2025 WL 2630826, at *15(followed)
- Sampiao, 2025 WL 2607924, at *12(followed)
- Hyppolite v. Noem, 2025 WL 2829511, at *15-*16 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2025)(followed)
- Günaydin v. Trump, 2025 WL 1459154, at *10 (D. Minn. May 21, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…