Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky grants Rajbir Singh’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court holds that 8 U.S.C. § 1226, rather than § 1225(b)(2), governs Singh’s detention and that his continued detention without an individualized bond hearing violates due process and the Immigration and Nationality Act. The court orders Singh’s immediate release and requires a bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge before any re-detention.
Holdings
- Section 1226, rather than Section 1225(b)(2), governed Singh's detention because he was not seeking admission and the Notice to Appear did not designate him as an arriving alien; the I-200 arrest warrant also derived its authority from Section 1226.
- Singh's continued detention violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the INA because he had been detained under Section 1226 without a merits bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge.
- The proper remedy was immediate release from the unlawful detention and a bond hearing on the merits before a neutral immigration judge before any re-detention.
Questions Presented
- Whether Singh's detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) or 8 U.S.C. § 1226.
- Whether Singh's continued detention without an individualized bond hearing violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Immigration and Nationality Act.
- Whether habeas relief should include immediate release and a bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (30)
- Edahi v. Lewis, 2025 WL 3466682, at *2-*3, *5-*13 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)
- Vicen v. Lewis, 2026 WL 541171, at *2-*9 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 26, 2026)(followed)
- Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, Case No. 25-1965 (6th Cir. Oct. 27, 2025)(not analyzed)
- Alvarez v. Noem, Case No. 25-1969 (6th Cir. Oct. 27, 2025)(not analyzed)
- Contreras-Cervantes v. Raycraft, Case No. 25-1978 (6th Cir. Oct. 28, 2025)(not analyzed)
- Pizarro Reyes v. Raycraft, Case No. 25-1982 (6th Cir. Oct. 29, 2025)(not analyzed)
- A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94 (2025)(followed)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)(followed)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 529 (2004)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 30.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.