Ricardo Reyes-Godenes v. Mike Lewis, Jailer, Hopkins County Jail; Samuel Olson, Interim Field Office Director, Chicago Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Kristi Noem, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Reyes-Godenes v. Lewis, Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-169-RGJ (W.D. Ky. Jan. 9, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Owensboro Division · January 9, 2026 · No. 4:25-cv-169-RGJ

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky grants Ricardo Reyes-Godenes’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court holds that his detention is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226 rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), because he had been present in the United States for more than twenty years and was not seeking admission. The court concludes that he is entitled to a bond hearing before an immigration judge.

Holdings

  1. Section 1226, not Section 1225(b)(2)(A), governed Reyes-Godenes's detention because he was already present in the United States, was not seeking admission, was placed in regular removal proceedings, and was arrested under a Form I-200 warrant authorized by Section 1226.
  2. Reyes-Godenes's continued detention without a merits bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the INA.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1226, governed the detention of a noncitizen who had lived in the United States for approximately twenty-five years, entered without inspection, and was not currently seeking admission.
  2. Whether continued detention without a merits bond hearing before an immigration judge violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Immigration and Nationality Act.
  3. What remedy was appropriate for the unlawful detention.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (15)

  • Edahi v. Lewis, 2025 WL 3466682, at *2-3, *9-13 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)
  • Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. 103, 107-09 (2020)(followed)
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 288-89, 301 (2018)(followed)
  • Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. Merrick Garland, Rodriguez Disa v. Garland, 53 F.4th 1189, 1197 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • In re Village Apothecary, Inc., 45 F.4th 940, 947 (6th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Castañon-Nava v. Department of Homeland Security, 161 F.4th 1048, 1061-62 (7th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Martinez v. Hyde, 792 F. Supp. 3d 211, 222 (D. Mass. 2025)(followed)
  • United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845, 857 (2022)(followed)
  • Corley v. United States, 556 U.S. 303, 314 (2009)(followed)
  • Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…