Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky adopts a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and grants Aggregate Processing, Inc.’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. The court concludes that the parties formed a binding settlement under Kentucky law and directs that a separate judgment incorporating the settlement terms be issued.
Holdings
- The district court adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation after receiving no objections and after examining the record.
- The parties entered into a binding settlement agreement during the settlement conference, and the agreement was enforceable under Kentucky law without requiring a signed writing on the facts presented.
- Aggregate Processing's motion to enforce the settlement was granted, and the court directed that a separate judgment incorporating the settlement terms be issued.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation when no objections were filed.
- Whether the parties entered into an enforceable settlement agreement during the settlement conference under Kentucky law.
- Whether the court should grant Aggregate Processing's motion to enforce the settlement and incorporate the settlement terms into a final judgment.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 151 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. White, 874 F.3d 490, 495 (6th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…