Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana grants Atlantic Oceanic, LLC’s motion to vacate the arrest of the vessels M/V Atlantic Power and M/V Atlantic Wind. The court concludes that, under Fifth Circuit precedent, Section 8 of the Federal Arbitration Act does not provide a basis for an in rem maritime action under Supplemental Rule C(1)(b) in a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award.
Holdings
- Federal Arbitration Act § 8 does not confer jurisdiction or create a right against a vessel in rem and therefore does not provide the statutory basis required for an action under Supplemental Rule C(1)(b) in this vessel-arrest proceeding.
- The warrants arresting the M/V Atlantic Power and M/V Atlantic Wind must be vacated because Fleetzero lacked a valid Rule C(1)(b) statutory basis for proceeding in rem.
Questions Presented
- Whether Federal Arbitration Act § 8 provides a statutory basis for an in rem maritime action under Supplemental Rule C(1)(b) to arrest vessels in an action seeking confirmation of an arbitration award.
- Whether the arrest warrants for the M/V Atlantic Power and M/V Atlantic Wind should be vacated under Supplemental Rule E(4)(f).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Casillo Commodities Italia, S.P.A. v. M/V Long Cheer, 2017 WL 2804925, at *2 (E.D. La. June 28, 2017)(followed)
- Diesel Specialties, LLC v. M/V Mohawk Traveler, 2009 WL 1036085, at *2 (E.D. La. Apr. 17, 2009)(followed)
- In re Murmansk Shipping Co., 2001 WL 699530, at *2 (E.D. La. June 18, 2001)(followed)
- Richardson Stevedoring & Logistics Servs., Inc. v. Daebo Int'l Shipping Co., Ltd., 2015 WL 1781712 (E.D. La. Apr. 20, 2015)(followed)
- Sembawang Shipyard, Ltd. v. Charger, Inc., 955 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…