Summary
In this memorandum order, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana denied Defendants’ motion to seal exhibits filed with their motion for summary judgment. The court held that Defendants had not substantiated a confidentiality justification or shown that the law enforcement privilege applied, and permitted the exhibits to be filed with redactions under Local Rule 5.7.12.
Holdings
- Defendants did not establish sufficient grounds to overcome the presumption of public access to judicial records, so their motion to file the four exhibits under seal was denied.
- The potential federal law-enforcement privilege did not justify sealing the exhibits because the criminal matter had concluded and defendants did not demonstrate that the privilege applied to these court records.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants established sufficient grounds to file arrest-related exhibits supporting their summary-judgment motion under seal.
- Whether a federal law-enforcement privilege justified sealing court records after the underlying criminal matter had concluded.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Binh Hoa Le v. Exeter Fin. Corp., 990 F.3d 410, 418, 419-20 (5th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- In re U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 459 F.3d 565, 570-71 (5th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- In re Sealing & Non-Disclosure of Pen/Trap/2703(d) Ords., 562 F. Supp. 2d 876, 885 (S.D. Tex. 2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…