Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan conditionally granted Nayeli Marisol Ruiz-Gonzalez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2)(A), governs her detention and concluded that her mandatory detention violated the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Respondents were ordered to provide a bond hearing within five business days or release her, and certain respondents were dismissed.
Holdings
- The court declined to enforce prudential exhaustion and held in the alternative that waiver of exhaustion was appropriate.
- Section 1226(a), rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), governs the detention of a noncitizen who resided in the United States and was apprehended and arrested within the United States under the circumstances presented.
- Petitioner's current detention under the mandatory-detention framework of § 1225(b)(2)(A) violated the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause.
- The Detroit ICE Field Office Director was not the only proper respondent. The court retained the Field Office Director and the Secretary of Homeland Security and dismissed the Department of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should require petitioner to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking § 2241 habeas relief.
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), governs the detention of a noncitizen who had resided in the United States and was apprehended within the United States.
- Whether petitioner's detention under the mandatory-detention framework of § 1225(b)(2)(A) violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause.
- Whether the Detroit ICE Field Office Director is the only proper respondent in a habeas action challenging immigration detention.
- What relief should be granted on the § 2241 petition.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (7)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687 (2001)(followed)
- A. A. R. P. v. Trump, 145 S. Ct. 1364, 1367 (2025)(followed)
- Antele Cobix v. Raycraft, No. 1:25-cv-1669, 2025 WL 3562651 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2025)(followed)
- Candela Bastidas v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-1528, 2025 WL 3562638 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2025)(followed)
- Acuna Sanchez v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-1442, 2025 WL 3562577 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2025)(followed)
- Penagos Robles v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. 1:25-cv-1578, 2025 WL 3558128 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 12, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…