Cecilia Ruiz Gonzalez, et al. v. Taqueria El Texano, LLC, et al.

Cecilia Ruiz Gonzalez v. Taqueria El Texano, LLC, No. 1:24-cv-0967 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division · January 27, 2026 · No. 1:24-cv-0967

Summary

This Report and Recommendation addresses Plaintiffs’ petition for attorney fees and costs following a default judgment against Defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Michigan wage law, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. The magistrate judge recommends awarding $6,534.00 in attorney and paralegal fees and $1,934.68 in costs. The recommendation was issued after Defendants failed to respond to the fee petition.

Holdings

  1. The reasonable fee is calculated using the lodestar method: the number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.
  2. The requested hourly rate of $450 for Plaintiffs' attorney and $135 for the paralegal was reasonable.
  3. The claimed nine attorney hours and 18.4 paralegal hours were reasonable.
  4. The requested $1,934.68 in costs was reasonable under the circumstances and should be awarded.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiffs were entitled to recover the requested attorney fees and paralegal fees after obtaining a default judgment.
  2. Whether the requested hourly rates and hours expended were reasonable under the lodestar method.
  3. Whether Plaintiffs' requested litigation costs, including service and alternative-service expenses, were reasonable and recoverable.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (14)

  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983)(followed)
  • Perdue v. Kenny A., 559 U.S. 542, 546 (2010)(followed)
  • Isabel v. City of Memphis, 404 F.3d 404, 415 (6th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Adcock-Ladd v. Sec'y of Treasury, 227 F.3d 343, 349-50 (6th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., Inc., 510 F.3d 610, 617 (6th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Hadix v. Johnson, 65 F.3d 532, 536 (6th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895-96 & n.11 (1984)(followed)
  • Coulter v. Tennessee, 805 F.2d 146, 149 (6th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Plyler v. Evatt, 902 F.2d 273, 277 (4th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Wells v. Corporate Accounts Receivable, 683 F. Supp. 2d 600, 603 (W.D. Mich. 2010)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…