Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan approved and adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of Plaintiff Fredrick Ledell Buford’s complaint. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), found no good-faith basis for appeal, and closed the case.
Holdings
- When a party properly objects to portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court must determine de novo the objected-to portions and may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition.
- The complaint failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted and was properly dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
- The court found no good-faith basis for an appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation after de novo review of Plaintiff's objections.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
- Whether the plaintiff had a good-faith basis for appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208, 1215 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…