Luis Rituay-Yanac v. Kevin Raycraft et al.

No. 1:25-cv-1909 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 2, 2026) · United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division · February 2, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-1909

Summary

The United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan dismissed without prejudice Luis Rituay-Yanac’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his immigration detention and seeking a bond hearing or release. The court concluded that the petition was apparently moot because Petitioner had already received a bond hearing and had not challenged the constitutionality or adequacy of that hearing.

Holdings

  1. A § 2241 petition seeking a bond hearing is moot when the petitioner has already received a bond hearing and does not challenge the hearing itself.
  2. When the Article III case-or-controversy requirement is not satisfied, the federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and must dismiss the action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking a bond hearing or release became moot after the immigration court conducted a bond hearing before the district court resolved the petition.
  2. Whether the district court should dismiss the petition without prejudice because no live case or controversy remained.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687 (2001)(followed)
  • A. A. R. P. v. Trump, 145 S. Ct. 1364, 1367 (2025)(followed)
  • Cal. Palms Addiction Recovery Campus, Inc. v. United States, 158 F.4th 726, 730 (6th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Mokdad v. Sessions, 876 F.3d 167, 169-170 (6th Cir. 2017)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…