Michael James Krusell v. Mathew Leirstein, et al.

Summary

A magistrate judge recommends dismissal of Michael James Krusell’s action for failure to prosecute because mail was returned as undeliverable and Plaintiff failed to provide an updated address. The recommendation relies on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the court’s local rule, and the factors governing dismissal for failure to prosecute, while providing Plaintiff 14 days to file objections.

Holdings

1. The magistrate judge recommended dismissal of Plaintiff's action for failure to prosecute because Plaintiff failed to maintain a current address with the Court after receiving a warning that such failure could result in dismissal.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the action should be dismissed for failure to prosecute because Plaintiff failed to keep the Court informed of a current mailing address.
2. Whether the factors governing dismissal for failure to prosecute supported recommending dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and applicable local rules.

Disposition

other