Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of New York directs the respondent in Andre Vernon's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition to brief whether the petition is timely under AEDPA's statute of limitations. The order also provides Vernon an opportunity to respond and requires production of relevant state-court records and appellate materials.
Holdings
- Before dismissing the petition sua sponte as untimely, the court must provide Vernon notice and an opportunity to be heard on the statute-of-limitations issue.
- The court required respondent to file a memorandum addressing whether the petition is timely under AEDPA, together with supporting authority and relevant exhibits, before the court determines the limitations issue.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should require briefing and the state-court record to determine whether Vernon's § 2254 petition is timely under AEDPA's statute of limitations.
- Whether the court must provide Vernon notice and an opportunity to be heard before dismissing the habeas petition as untimely.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- People v. Vernon, 186 A.D.3d 1276 (4th Dep't 2016)(followed)
- Acosta v. Artuz, 221 F.3d 117, 125 (2d Cir. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…