Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of New York grants Plaintiff Christopher P.’s motion for $11,000 in attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) following a favorable Social Security benefits judgment. The court finds the fee reasonable and directs counsel to refund the previously awarded $2,500 EAJA fee to Plaintiff.
Holdings
- A district court may approve a contingent-fee award within the statutory 25% limit only after independently determining that the fee is reasonable; the court approved counsel's $11,000.00 request because it was well below the statutory and contractual maximum, was supported by the quality and results of the representation, and was not the product of fraud, overreaching, or a windfall.
- When the attorney receives both an EAJA fee and a larger fee under § 406(b) for the same representation, the attorney must refund the lesser fee to the client.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's requested $11,000.00 fee was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
- Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded $2,500.00 EAJA fee to Plaintiff after receiving the larger § 406(b) award.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794 (2002)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 (2002)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 849, 852-54 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 372 (2d Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Wells v. Bowen, 855 F.2d 37, 42 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…