Summary
The United States District Court for the Western District of New York granted Plaintiff Hector I. G.’s motion for $23,960.00 in attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), representing 25% of his past-due Social Security benefits. The court found the fee reasonable and directed counsel to refund the previously awarded $7,617.45 Equal Access to Justice Act fee to Plaintiff.
Holdings
- A district court must begin its § 406(b) fee review with the parties' contingency-fee agreement and may reduce the agreed fee only if the fee is unreasonable; the fee may not exceed 25% of the claimant's past-due benefits.
- When counsel receives both an EAJA fee and a larger fee under § 406(b), counsel must refund the lesser EAJA award to the claimant.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's request for $23,960.00, equal to 25% of Plaintiff's past-due Social Security benefits, was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
- Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded $7,617.45 EAJA fee to Plaintiff after receiving the larger § 406(b) fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794 (2002)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 (2002)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 849 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 852-53 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 854 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 372 (2d Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Wells v. Bowen, 855 F.2d 37, 42 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…